Open the document
Drop the PDF in. It loads.
Highlight, strike through, draw, add shapes. Everything you would do with a pen, on screen, and nothing gets uploaded.
Highlight, strike through, draw, add shapes. Everything you would do with a pen, on screen, and nothing gets uploaded.
Drop the PDF in. It loads.
Drag over text to highlight or strike through. Draw freehand, add boxes and arrows.
Download the marked-up file and reply with it.
Everything you need is ready in the browser.
Drop the PDF in. It loads.
Drag over text to highlight or strike through. Draw freehand, add boxes and arrows.
Download the marked-up file and reply with it.
Highlight what matters, strike through what should go, and draw to point at things a highlight cannot reach.
The useful discipline is consistency. Reviewers who highlight in three colors with no system produce a document the author has to decode. One color for "must change", another for "consider", stated once at the top, saves an email exchange.
Annotation adds a layer of comment on top. Editing changes what the document says. That distinction matters more than it sounds.
When you highlight a clause, the clause is untouched. Anyone opening the file sees the original with your mark on it, and can tell which is which. That is the point of a review: showing what you think without altering what you were sent.
Editing rewrites. The next reader sees your version with no indication of what was there before. For your own document that is what you want. For a contract somebody sent you, changing the text and returning it silently is a good way to lose trust.
Yes. Marks are written into the file rather than stored beside it, so they open the same way everywhere.
This is worth checking with any annotation tool, because some store marks in their own database and show them only in their own viewer. Send that file to somebody using anything else and it arrives clean, with all your comments invisible. You find out when they reply asking what you meant.
Marks written into the document travel with it, in Acrobat, in a browser, in Preview on a Mac, and when printed.
Highlighting is for "look at this". Striking through is for "this should go". Drawing is for everything a rectangle of color cannot say.
The mistake most reviewers make is highlighting everything they read carefully, which turns the document yellow and communicates nothing. A highlight is a signal, and signals only work when they are rare.
Strike-through is more precise than a highlight and underused. It says exactly what should happen to the text, needs no accompanying note, and cannot be misread as approval, which a highlight sometimes is.
Drawing earns its place on anything that is not a paragraph. A number in a table, a region of a chart, the gap between two columns where something is missing. Text tools cannot point at the absence of something; an arrow can.
Send the whole file rather than screenshots, and say what the colors mean if you used more than one.
Screenshots of annotated pages lose the ability to search, cannot be scrolled, and force the author to work out which page they came from. The file is smaller and more useful.
A short covering note helps more than people expect: how many things need changing, whether anything blocks approval, and what the colors mean. Fourteen highlights with no explanation is a puzzle. "Six changes, the two in red are blockers" is a task.
It does not thread comments. Marks live on the page; there is no reply-and-resolve conversation in the free editor. That exists in a workspace, where a document has a team around it.
It does not track who annotated what. In the free editor there is no identity, so every mark is anonymous. For a review where attribution matters, that is a real limitation.
It does not compare two versions. Showing what changed between drafts is a different tool.
Open the editor to work on your file in the browser, with no account or watermark.
Yes, while you are in the editor. Once downloaded the marks are part of the file.
Yes. They are part of the page, so they print as they appear.
You can draw, add shapes and add text on it. Highlighting text needs selectable text, which a scan does not have.
No. Marks sit on top and the underlying content is untouched.
Everything you need to take a document from raw file to reviewed, signed and filed.